Monday, December 2, 2013

Book Blog # 80: Keeping the Castle by Patrice Kindl

Title: Keeping the Castle
Author: Patrice Kindl
# of Pages: 261 (paperback)
Genre: YA, Historical Fiction, Romance
Rating: ★☆☆☆☆
Synopsis: Seventeen-year-old Althea is the sole support of her entire family, and she must marry well. But there are few wealthy suitors--or suitors of any kind--in their small Yorkshire town of Lesser Hoo. Then, the young and attractive (and very rich) Lord Boring arrives, and Althea sets her plans in motion. There's only one problem; his friend and business manager Mr. Fredericks keeps getting in the way. And, as it turns out, Fredericks has his own set of plans . . .
Review: This review will contain minor spoilers covering the contents of the beginning of the book (i.e. character development). Major spoilers will be hidden as usual.

No. Just no.

Althea is not humble nor does she seem to take marriage seriously. I'm also a bit concern as to how knowledgeable she is to certain matters. Below is a quote from the first chapter:

"'...Best to aim for a younger man. You see, dearest, there are certain aspects of marriage - ' She bent her head as she helped Alexander to climb up upon her lap - 'it is not proper for you to know about them yet, but you must trust me to know what I am speaking about - that make a younger man much more pleasing'" (Kindl 8).
This is her mother saying this to Althea. I find it peculiar that this seventeen year-old girl has yet to learn about such things that her mother was avoiding telling her about.  Throughout the book, Althea continues to tell herself (and others tell her) that she is still young yet to marry. And while this may be true today, (to my knowledge) seventeen is well into marrying age. And, yes, I found Althea very, very annoying. She goes on about how horrible her stepsisters, yet she's not exactly an angel herself.

Also, if Althea and her family are so poor, why do they have servants? I get that they kept the castle for Alexander's inheritance, but if they are struggling to eat, wouldn't they fire their staff first? For a while, I thought that perhaps the servants were not there because they were being paid, but because they were loyal to their family. However, later on in the book, it is said that the servants are paid. Wouldn't it but SO much better if they had the money that they had to use to pay the servants? Plus that's quiet a few mouths that they wouldn't have to feed.



I absolutely DO NOT recommend this book!

No comments:

Post a Comment